Housing Affordability · United States · Updated May 2026
Most affordable US states — price-to-income ratio
The price-to-income ratio divides median home value by median household income. A lower ratio means more affordable. West Virginia leads with 2.7×, meaning a typical home costs 2.7 years of household income. Data: ACS 5-Year 2024.
The national median price-to-income ratio is 3.9×. Every state on this list sits below that line — the gap between West Virginia and the median is the clearest single measure of how much cheaper these ten markets are than typical US homeownership.
These rankings use the 2024 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates, covering the period 2020–2024. Median home value and median household income are measured at the state level. The ratio is computed as median home value ÷ median household income.
All 50 states + DC ranked
Most affordable states — complete ranking
The most affordable states are concentrated in the Midwest and South — regions where home prices have historically tracked closer to local incomes. Iowa (2.8×), Kansas (2.9×), Indiana (3×) all rank in the top tier. Western states dominate the bottom of the affordability table, with Hawaii (8.4×), California (7.4×), Oregon (5.8×) among the least affordable.
A ratio below 3× is generally considered affordable by housing economists. Between 3× and 5× indicates a strained market. Above 5× — the level seen in Hawaii, California, and Massachusetts — represents a severe affordability crisis where homeownership is effectively out of reach for median-income households without substantial outside assistance. The ten states above range from 2.7× to 3.2× — clustering right at this 3× line rather than sitting deep beneath it, but every one stays well short of the strained-or-worse territory at the other end of this ranking.
Methodology
How the price-to-income ratio is calculated
The price-to-income ratio is calculated by dividing the median home value by the median household income for each state. Both figures come from the US Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS) 5-Year Estimates, 2024 release (covering survey years 2020–2024).
Affordable states share one consistent, data-backed pattern: median home value has simply stayed low relative to median household income, whatever the underlying cause. This site tracks ACS home values and incomes, not zoning, land supply, migration flows, or wage composition by sector — it can measure the gap but not attribute it to a specific driver. Treat any explanation for why a given state stayed affordable as informed speculation, not something this dataset confirms.
Limitations: the ratio uses state-level medians, which can mask significant variation within states. A state like California has affordable inland counties alongside severely unaffordable coastal metros. For county-level data, use the interactive map.
Data source: US Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates (2024). Supplemented with FHFA House Price Index for county-level trend data.
Common questions
FAQ — most affordable states
What is the most affordable state to buy a home?
West Virginia is the most affordable state with a price-to-income ratio of 2.7×. Other top affordable states include Iowa (2.8×), Kansas (2.9×), Indiana (3×).
Which states are most affordable for first-time homebuyers?
The most accessible states for first-time buyers are West Virginia, Iowa, Kansas, Indiana, Mississippi — all with ratios well below the national median of 3.9×. These markets offer conventional mortgages at income multiples that fit standard lending thresholds.
What is a good price-to-income ratio when buying a home?
Below 3× is considered affordable. Between 3–5× is strained. Above 5× is a severe affordability crisis. The national median is 3.9×.
Are Midwestern states the most affordable in the US?
Yes. Iowa, Kansas, Indiana, and Ohio consistently rank among the most affordable, with price-to-income ratios well below the national median. This site's data shows the gap but doesn't track the underlying drivers — migration, zoning, wage growth by sector — so it can confirm that the gap exists, not why.